Technology Responsibility Failure - Food Animals

Question: Discuss about the Technology Responsibility for Failure, Food Animals. Answer: Introduction: In the present scenario, this has become a matter of contention whether to continue the traditional way of eating food or should think differently to meet the need of daily nutrition for health. In this concern, a question comes here, i.e. whether these new easily edible but technologically invented foods are safe or not for health (Sax 2016). According to several reports, technically developed food substitutes are not healthy; not only the health concern but also eating technological food alternatives like Soylent Bar is tending to change the manner of eating for the human being. There is a term called food futurism that focuses on blending utopian ideas of tech-foods with the requirement of natural ingredients (Sax 2016). Food habits have been undergoing evolution since the first time food has been discovered. However, now the situation has got critical because the new trend of putting the nutritional supplements, required to live by humans, in a single and easily digestible technological formula is not going well. Galusky (2014), mentioned that intaking of food that has natural taste is the best option for both taste and health rather depending on the artificial food that do not satisfy the appetite of the human being. Reference list: Galusky, W., 2014. Technology as responsibility: Failure, food animals, and lab-grown meat.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,27(6), pp.931-948. Sax, D. 2016 The Real Soylent Sickness Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-real-soylent-sickness [Accessed on 14-12-2016]